- #FREEMIND VS FREEPLANE VS XMIND PORTABLE#
- #FREEMIND VS FREEPLANE VS XMIND PRO#
- #FREEMIND VS FREEPLANE VS XMIND SOFTWARE#
This is accessed from the application menu: Help > Documentation. įreeMind's documentation is itself available as a FreeMind mindmap, demonstrating many of the features of the application.
#FREEMIND VS FREEPLANE VS XMIND SOFTWARE#
įreeMind was a finalist for Best Project in 's Community Choice Awards for 2008, which featured open-source software projects. Mac users may notice the most difference from their traditional user interface, but a MacWorld reviewer says the software's features should still appeal to the segment of users who accept function over form.
#FREEMIND VS FREEPLANE VS XMIND PORTABLE#
As a Java application, FreeMind is portable across multiple platforms and retains the same user interface, causing some amount of variation from the common interface on each platform. The non-linear approach assists in brainstorming new outlines and projects as ideas are added around the mind map. Īs with other mind mapping software packages, FreeMind allows the user to edit a hierarchical set of ideas around a central concept. It runs on Microsoft Windows, Linux, and macOS via the Java Runtime Environment. It provides extensive export capabilities. FreeMind is licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 2. FreeMind itself was last updated in 2014. Hope that helps! There is never one perfect solution.FreeMind is a free mind mapping application written in Java, which is further developed by the fork Freeplane until today (2021). I work in India and can only expect my students to use OpenSource software.
#FREEMIND VS FREEPLANE VS XMIND PRO#
They have also moved to the crippleware system, and while that is a valid choice of course, and the crippled version itself is more than adequate for student use (I use the Pro version myself) who knows what they will do next.Development seems to have ground to a halt, and the minimalist technical support provided at the Google Groups forum is exasperating. The way it has moved ahead of FM/FP in many ways is absolutely stunning, but that all seems in the past. It is an extremely strange and paradoxical company. Mostly: Im really concerned about the ongoing survival of XM.I kept coming across klutzy aspects in using XM.students overall seemed to find XMind a little less intuitive to master than FP.XMind's features (particularly the first three in the list above).
Iteration, even though I would enormously regret losing access to several of Having done so, I think I will consider returning to FP for the next So I used it recently for the first time for the most recent iteration of my easy transfer (by students) of maps on a web page to the main mapping window.excellent embedding of maps on web pages.one can have a maps with convergent or divergent logical structure (or a mix, as is found in many texts, even paragraphs).one can have multiple maps on a single page.very attractive, flexible and overall quite intuitive graphically.Very tempting from many points of view for me: Of scientific writing (argumentation/explanation/text organisation in theĬontext of writing research articles and proposals). Rationale at the beginning) extensively for teaching postgrad students aspects Over the last 6 years Ive been using Freemind/Freeplane and XMind (and
0 kommentar(er)
